https://reurl.cc/Ym0dDx
The NBA has found no evidence showing LA Clippers owner Steve Ballmer
funneled money through team sponsors to pay Kawhi Leonard in order to
circumvent the salary cap, according to three people with knowledge of
discussions between the two sides in recent days.
根據三名了解雙方近日討論內容的消息人士透露，NBA並未發現任何證據顯示洛杉磯快艇老
闆Steve Ballmer曾透過球隊贊助商將資金轉給Kawhi Leonard，藉此規避薪資上限。
Instead, the NBA is focused on whether the team's introduction of Leonard to
team sponsors constitutes a violation of the league's rules prohibiting
salary cap circumvention, two of the sources said. The league is examining
whether the Clippers are guilty of "failure to supervise" employees, though
it's unclear what specific rule the team would have violated or what the
penalties would be, two of the sources said.
相反地，NBA目前調查的重點，是快艇將Leonard介紹給球隊贊助商的行為，是否構成違反
聯盟禁止規避薪資上限的相關規定。兩名消息人士表示，聯盟正在審查快艇是否涉及對員
工"監督不周"的問題，不過目前尚不清楚球隊具體違反了哪一項規則，也不清楚可能面臨
何種處罰。
The 11-month investigation into salary cap circumvention allegations expanded
beyond Leonard's deal with Aspiration, the now-defunct green banking company
at the center of the allegations, to at least three other companies that also
had deals with the Clippers, two of the sources familiar with the talks told
ESPN. However, sources said, the league has presented no evidence that
Ballmer funneled money to Leonard.
這項針對規避薪資上限指控的調查已持續11個月，調查範圍也從Leonard與目前已倒閉、同
時也是整起指控核心的綠色金融公司Aspiration之間的合約，擴大至至少另外三家同樣與
快艇有合作關係的公司。兩名了解相關討論的消息人士向ESPN透露了上述資訊。不過，消
息人士表示，聯盟至今並未提出任何證據，證明Ballmer曾將資金轉給Leonard。
The league presented initial findings of its investigation, led by law firm
Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, to the Clippers in late July, according to
multiple people familiar with the matter. In recent days, both sides have
been negotiating a resolution to the investigation, the people said. Those
talks

“查無不法，謝謝指教”的概念嗎？

哈哈，查無不法，謝謝指教

快艇肯定配合調查啊 整件事流程就是沒有任何問題可以定罪這件事就是目前這張合約沒給到滿啊如果這算證據 不就表示老闆有投資的任何公司完全不能請球員代言？要管到這麼嚴會對球員超極不利欸問題是大家都幹了啊 球隊贊助商都贊助球隊了 不找球星代言說實話也太怪了 不然還要找別隊球星代言喔聯盟敢罰就是斷球員財路

要這樣玩是什麼？那每隊都來這樣搞，薪資上限無意義

社會觀感不佳但查無不法，謝謝指教

你信嗎 反正我是不信

要堵漏洞也很簡單 沒拿滿頂薪的一律不能接老闆和球隊贊助者投資產業的相關代言 但是阿銀敢嗎？ 球員工會會暴動吧要說大城市球隊就差別待遇 所以小城市哪隊因為贊助商給球員代言就被罰了？實務上 能拿到很多業外收入的本來就是頂薪球員 當然目前有一個拿底薪的 但那是特例

世界上有那麼巧的事情 老闆投大錢在一間願意給他球

搞不清楚狀況的人真多沒證據只透過虛假造謠的爆料就跟風台灣群眾的媒體識讀能力真的很可憐