https://official.nba.com/pool-report-from-the-miami-at-charlotte-game-tonight/
QUESTION: Why was the play not reviewed in real time?
ZARBA: The play wasn’t whistled in real time. Play continued with a fast break. And because play wasn’t stopped immediately, and there was no whistle on the play, the window to review the play was closed. Play was stopped, after a change of possession, and then a time out. So, by rule, our window to review that play then is closed.
問：為什麼當下沒有馬上看重播
答：那個play當下沒有響哨，比賽繼續而且正在快攻，經過一次球權轉換後才叫了暫停，根據規則，看重播的窗口已經過了
QUESTION: Was it later reviewed by the officiating crew in the locker room or by the Replay Center?
ZARBA: Our crew. We review all our plays, So, we reviewed the play at halftime.
問：後續你們裁判組或是重播中心有再次檢視這個play嗎
答：我們裁判組會重看每個play，我們在中場休息時看了。
QUESTION: Should have it risen to the level of a flagrant foul if reviewed?
ZARBA: At this point, that goes to league operations, and they’ll make a determination on that in the coming days. So, they will make that determination and go from there.
問：如果當下有看重播，這個動作是否應該升級成惡意犯規
答：這部分要交給聯盟去決定，他們會在接下來的幾天做出判決，再做進一步的處理。
簡單來說再來就是看聯盟怎麼判了