2026年2月趙麻石採訪：
https://youtu.be/F7XzJfvtfRQ?t=1427
Dgon：你對目前軟工資帽制度(SFR)有什麼看法？
趙麻石：
I think we're an LCK title away from Keria and Oner qualifying for, like, a
lower rate against the SFR, but I never liked it, to be honest. Like, I was a
no vote for a while, and then I went along with the group because everyone
else wanted it.
And I understand the thought process of why rising salaries (cap), but I am
more of a capitalist in the sense of, like, you're worth your market rate,
and I want to pay you X.
Yeah. Like, why should I be punished for that?
2026年9月阿諾德聲明：
Gen.G doesn't have a vote on the SFR and we don't have a veto. Teams don't
formally vote on it. The league consults us, we tell them what we think, and
the league makes the call it believes is right for the league.
I'm not going to get into what we specifically said or didn't say in those
conversations. But no team including us is going to push for something that
works against itself. 10 teams means 10 different opinions, and I don't know
what the other 9 told the league, so I can only speak to our view. The league
is the only one that hears all 10, and the call is theirs to make.
趙麻石與阿諾德說法的主要矛盾
1.「I was a no vote」vs.「Teams don't formally vote on it」
趙麻石：I was a no vote for a while
直譯就是：「有一段時間我是反對票。」
這很容易讓人理解成「當時存在正式的 Yes/No 投票」。
阿諾德：Teams don't formally vote on it.
明確說：「各戰隊對工資帽法沒有正式進行投票。」
如果趙麻石的 no vote 是指「正式投反對票」，兩者確實存在直接矛盾。
如果趙麻石只是口語化地說「我當時是反對立場」，那就可以解釋成沒有正式矛盾。
但是，無法確定趙麻石想要表達的意思為以上哪一種。
2.「everyone else wanted it」vs.「I don't know what the other 9 told the
league」
趙麻石：everyone else wanted it
字面上就是：「其他所有人都想要(工資帽)。」
如果這裡的 everyone else 指其他LCK戰隊，那就非常容易被解讀成：
「只有T1反對，其他9隊全部支持」
阿諾德：10 teams means 10 different opinions, and I don't know what the other 9 told the league,
so I can only speak to our view.
直譯：「10 支戰隊就有 10 種不同的意見，我不知道其他 9 支戰隊告訴聯盟什麼，所以我只能
談我們自己的立場。」
阿諾德拒絕替其他9隊發言。
總而言之，如果T1粉絲根據趙麻石的話說：
「其他9隊都想要工資帽。」
這個結論其實沒有被 Gen.G 阿諾德的說法證實。
3.「I went along with the group」vs. Gen.G 說最終決定權在聯盟
趙麻石：I went along with the group cuz everyone else wanted it.
容易理解成：「大家都支持，所以我最後跟隨大家的意見。」
這會讓人產生「戰隊之間形成多數決／團體決定」的印象。
阿諾德：The league consults us, we tell them what we think, and the league makes the call it believes is right for the league.
也就是：
聯盟徵詢戰隊意見 → 戰隊表達意見 → 聯盟自行作出決定
所以如果把趙麻石的話理解成：
「其他戰隊投票支持，所以 T1 最後跟著多數。」
那就和 Gen.G 描述的正式決策流程不一致。
4. 趙麻石的敘事很容易形成「T1 vs. 其他 9 隊」
趙麻石的敘事順序是：
I was a no vote
→ everyone else wanted it
→ I went along with the group
也就是：
我反對 → 其他所有人支持 → 我最後跟著大家意見。
這非常容易被簡化成：
「T1 是唯一反對者。」
但是 Gen.G 阿諾德的表述一直強調：
10 teams means 10 different opinions.
I don't know what the other 9 told the league.
這是在強調：
每支戰隊有自己的意見，而且 Gen.G 不替其他戰隊說話。
所以兩邊的敘事方式確實存在很大的差異。
結論：
目前沒有足夠證據證明T1是唯一反對工資帽法的戰隊，更沒有證據證明其他戰隊從未反對過。
趙麻石的『everyone else wanted it』是一種非常概括性的說法，卻很容易被粉絲解讀成『其他9隊全部支持』。
而且 Gen.G 立場反而強調 10 支戰隊有 10 種意見，且各隊並沒有正式投票。