我看了一下反法庭直播者振振有詞拿出來的條文，
也就是"聯邦訴訟條例"(FEDERAL RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE)
第五十三條，條文的內容是這樣規定的:
Except as otherwise provided by a statute or these rules,
the court must not permit the taking of photographs in the courtroom
during judicial proceedings or the broadcasting of judicial pro-
ceedings from the courtroom.
大家看到了嗎?
上面第一就寫"除非另有法令規定，否則司法流程禁止轉播"，
那麼，有沒有"另外的法令"規定呢?
很不好意思，是有的。
美國法院制定了一個"轉播條例"(Audio Streaming Pilot)，
規定說"合乎公眾利益"的法庭狀況可以轉播:
https://tinyurl.com/yxfxjxsp
這個條文一開始就寫得很清楚:
Approved district courts, bankruptcy courts,
the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, and the U.S. Court of International
Trade participated in a pilot program to livestream audio of certain
proceedings involving matters of public interest.
"有涉及公眾利益者可以轉播"
那啥又是"公眾利益"呢?
條例寫得很清楚，主要如下:
a claim that, once resolved,
may impact the public or a discernable group of people
(e.g., employees, residents of a city or state, consumers);
a case raising issues of public health or safety;
a case involving a civil rights claim;
a case involving a public entity, agency, or official;
a case that has received media attention.
1. 對公眾產生衝擊的訴案
2. 攸關公眾健康與安全的訴案
3. 牽扯民權的訴案
4. 牽扯進政府當局的訴案
5. 引發媒體關注的訴案
以上五點都是可以聲請直播的案例，
所以那些人拿著聯邦訴訟法第五十三條出來說話，完全是騙人不懂的說法。
我想他們都是博士、英文應該也都比我一個英文翻譯好，
那他們為什麼要騙人，我就不明白了。