Re: [閒聊] 實際上,JK羅琳還是缺席《重返霍格華茲》

作者: TED781120 (蒼夜歌)   2022-01-19 14:12:14
: 推 Landius: 再搞徹底一點,下一步就是真的把原作者取消掉了吧? 01/19 13:32
: 推 WLR: 作者人還活著就被ban 01/19 13:37
: → aa1052026: 一群白眼狼靠作者大撈後就把作者拋棄 噁心 01/19 13:39
: → oasis404: 靠作者IP吃飯還排擠作者 01/19 13:48
: → SangoGO: 羅琳沒有HP價值 01/19 13:49
: 推 kid725: 搞成這樣 JK蘿琳有沒有可能自己把版權收回去 反正賺夠多了 01/19 13:50
: → mapulcatt: 連影片都用舊的 太好笑了吧 01/19 13:51
: 推 xaxa0101: 下一步是不是要宣稱JK羅琳不是哈利波特的作者了? 01/19 13:54
: 推 HJC6666: 蘿琳不懂哈利波特 反正沒在電影出現的人不重要 01/19 13:54
以上倒不至於,我們來看看別的報導平衡一下。
https://bit.ly/33NxVXa
Return to Hogwarts: JK Rowling not ‘snubbed’ as she makes appearance in Harry
Potter reunion
重返霍格華茲並沒有冷落JK羅琳
First looks at the long-awaited Harry Potter reunion special Return to Hogwarts
have revealed that author JK Rowling has not been omitted as early reports claim
ed.
節目並沒有像早期報導宣稱的冷落JK羅琳。
Tabloid reports claimed that Rowling had been “snubbed” from the production du
e to the controversy surrounding her views on transgender rights.
有些媒體聲稱因為跨性別爭議,JK羅琳在節目中被冷落。
However, with the special now released in the UK, viewers can watchcast members
discuss how much of an impact Rowling’s books had on them personally, before sh
e makes an appearance herself.
你可以在節目中看到演員們暢談JK羅琳如何影響他們的人生。
https://bit.ly/3FF4YKw
Return to Hogwarts review: Harry Potter reunion is filled with magical moments
評論重返霍格華茲。
Much of the speculation surrounding this reunion had, unfortunately, been to do
with how much involvement JK Rowling would have. The author who wrote so beautif
ully about embracing people because of their differences, not in spite of them,
and whose books spoke so powerfully to people who felt like social outcasts, has
become associated with a series of controversial remarks about one of the most
marginalised groups in the UK: transgender people. The press gleefully reported
of how she was being “cancelled” by the very franchise she created and “snubb
ed” from the reunion.
很不幸的這次圍繞這部節目的傳言很多都跟節目組因跨性別歧視問題冷落JK蘿琳有關。
That’s not the case here. The cast members make sincere comments about how Rowl
ing’s wizarding world impacted on them personally as children, as parents, and
as young actors unaware of just how much these films would change their lives. R
owling herself makes brief appearances in pre-recorded interviews from 2019, in
which she discusses the search for the right Harry (and the relief upon finding
Daniel Radcliffe). While there is, understandably, no mention of the controversy
Rowling has embroiled herself in outside of Harry Potter, the discussions of ho
w the films promoted acceptance, tolerance and friendship do seem to take on add
itional meaning.
這當然不是事實,JK羅琳有在節目中以2019年的影像出場,
並且你可以在節目中看到演員們如何談論她。
嗯,某種程度上我覺得更噁心了。
作者: Koyomiiii (Koyomi)   2022-01-19 14:14:00
這什麼護航啊www
作者: rotusea (M.Y.)   2022-01-19 14:17:00
2019年的影像wwwww是真的作者已死是嗎
作者: KOKEY (KOKE?)   2022-01-19 14:19:00
給個2021版訪談過分嗎,嗯sjw而言,真的太超過
作者: Y1999 (秋雨)   2022-01-19 14:19:00
時空背景不同啦
作者: allen0205 (阿邱)   2022-01-19 14:21:00
把人家搞的像已經死了一樣w
作者: HJC6666 (帕修)   2022-01-19 14:26:00
批鬥大會嗎wwwwwww
作者: guolong (+9吼溜肯)   2022-01-19 14:26:00
羅琳又還沒死,紀念啥
作者: mashiroro (~真白~)   2022-01-19 14:29:00
家屬答禮完的環節嗎=口=
作者: devilkool (對貓毛過敏的貓控)   2022-01-19 14:30:00
我們懷念她
作者: linzero (【林】)   2022-01-19 14:34:00
禮成
作者: RbJ (Novel)   2022-01-19 14:36:00
哈哈哈哈哈哈
作者: rotusea (M.Y.)   2022-01-19 14:38:00
羅琳啊,要跟著護法走啊(誤)
作者: aa384756 (yst)   2022-01-19 14:38:00
XDDDDDDD
作者: iam0718 (999)   2022-01-19 14:40:00
可憐 真的很悲哀
作者: s1032kj (無聊)   2022-01-19 14:44:00
我們懷念她
作者: caten (原PO不是人)   2022-01-19 14:47:00
2019時還沒乳跨的關係吧,時空切割原作者法
作者: mushrimp5466 (吃了蝦子的蘑菇)   2022-01-19 14:49:00
作者: kuramoto (暗黑爽健美茶)   2022-01-19 14:51:00
「我們沒排擠他啊,是他不想來被我們消費,應該算他排擠我們吧?」一副事不關己的講幹話,真的蠻噁心的
作者: Landius (原來我是漆原派啊)   2022-01-19 14:57:00
搞得跟這原作者只活到2019似的,這操作真心看不懂
作者: egg781 (喵吉)   2022-01-19 15:07:00
我第一次看到原作者好像要被抹掉一樣哪天他們訴求羅琳交出哈利波特的版權我也不意外了
作者: AuroraSkyFox (這裡是狐狸)   2022-01-19 15:08:00
拿過去的影像說現在沒這回事XDDD
作者: srxteam0935 (葉子人)   2022-01-19 15:09:00
為了政治正確把作者搞得像2019就往生一樣讚ㄛ背骨仔
作者: gibbs1286 (學無止境是國關)   2022-01-19 15:38:00
嘔嘔嘔嘔嘔嘔嘔嘔嘔嘔
作者: isu0911   2022-01-19 16:39:00
.....

Links booklink

Contact Us: admin [ a t ] ucptt.com